What does JD Vance really believe? | Sidney Blumenthal
The world is on fire, but in Washington DC topic A is Olivia Nuzzi. Her suspension as a writer for New York Magazine for sharing ?demure? nude photographs of herself and other indiscreet communications with Robert F Kennedy Jr has engendered gales of hilarity to relieve the tension of the razor-thin close campaign.
Nuzzi?s relationship in journalistic terms fits the supreme court?s ruling on presidential immunity of the distinction between Donald Trump?s ?private? and ?official? acts involving the January 6 insurrection. In the spirit of the court and The Scarlet Letter, the blond bombshell has received more punishment for sexting than the blond bomber has for attempting a coup.
In the hurricane of gossip the most notable public discussion of the Nuzzi affair was an exchange of two buddies giggling at their lowbrow humor. ?There?s this weird sex scandal story going on right now,? says the first. ?The media is obsessed with ? I don?t think there was any actual sex in the sex scandal.? Hahaha. His pal snickers, ?That?s how I?m sure it is.? They guffaw. ?I think that?s right,? replies the first. They laugh together in a communion of their misplaced coolness, unclever witticisms and pubescent misogyny.
This is not dialogue from an episode of Beavis and Butt-Head. It is not a cartoon. It is not a satire. The first jokester is the Republican candidate for vice-president, Senator JD Vance of Ohio. His interlocutor is Tucker Carlson, the erstwhile No 1 Fox News host, fired as a liability, financial and personal, and left to roam untethered in the social media wasteland.
Vance appeared on stage with Carlson on his tour on 22 September, undeterred after Carlson had recently featured a Hitler apologist and Holocaust revisionist on his podcast. Vance preferred to talk about Nuzzi rather than the Nazis. After raising the kerfuffle unprompted, he swiveled without a skip to lay out a cascading conspiracy theory pinging from Joe Biden to Kamala Harris to the entire press corps with an inference to Nuzzi. Biden is ?sleepwalking into world war three?, he declared, then jumping to ?the reason why we have Joe Biden is because Kamala Harris lied about his mental fitness in office. If you actually care about the truth, ask those questions and leave this salacious bullshit to the tabloids. But they can?t do that. And if they did, Tucker, again, if they did, a lot of them would lose their jobs.?
So, in translation, the Nuzzi affair is really the media?s way to avoid confirming Vance?s conspiracy theory. The third world war weighs on Vance?s mind. It is a meme, like the ?cat meme? about the Haitians, as he called it. In the mode of Butt-Head impersonating a serious person, Vance told Tucker: ?We?re worried about getting involved in world war three because we should be, because we have nuclear weapons now, and you have to be cautious about that stuff.? Tucker was gravely silent.
Without missing a beat, Vance offered a new wrinkle in the great replacement theory. ?If you look at the Liz Cheney, Dick Cheney view, their basic argument is, let?s flood the United States with millions upon millions of foreign laborers because that?s good for business.? Now it was the conservative endorsers of Harris who were to blame for the bogeyman of immigration. Vance was unconcerned that Liz Cheney had been ousted as chair of the House Republican conference for investigating January 6 and defeated in a primary for her seat, and that Dick Cheney had ceased serving as vice-president more than 15 years ago. It was their fault.
?The third thing,? said Vance, ?that I think really divides the parties, and it?s like me, Bobby Kennedy, Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump, we?re all on the same page on this is, do you think that the United States should ship its entire industrial base to foreign countries, some of which hate us??
First of all, ?the third thing? wasn?t the third thing, but more about the second thing. Second, by embracing Bobby Kennedy, Vance didn?t seem aware he was back to another thing ? ?this weird sex scandal story?. Then, he returned to the subject of Springfield, Ohio, which is his warped example to prove the replacement theory, his first, second and third thing. ?Amen,? said Tucker.
Vance is Trump?s running mate in large part because of the influence of Carlson. For the past couple of years, he has been escorting Vance to introduce him to people hostile to Nato. At least one of them was nonplussed when, rather than sticking to the menace of Nato expansion, he expatiated on his many pathological stepfathers. Carlson notoriously appeared in Budapest under the auspices of the pro-Putin Hungarian authoritarian Viktor Orb?n. Vance has been uniformly opposed to support for Ukraine. On the eve of Russia?s invasion, he said: ?I don?t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or another.?
In the battle over who Trump would chose as his running mate, Carlson was pitted against Rupert Murdoch, who had fired him from his perch at Fox. Murdoch favored the wealthy businessman and North Dakota governor, Doug Burgum. ?When your enemies are pushing a running mate on you,? Carlson told Trump about Murdoch, according to the New York Times, ?it?s a pretty good sign you should ignore them.?
Trump had to overcome his aversion to Vance for his remarks that he was an ?idiot?, ?unfit for our nation?s highest office? and a looming ?American Hitler?. On 4 January 2021, two days before the assault on the US Capitol, Carlson wrote in a private text about Trump, ?I hate him passionately,? but subsequently ingratiated himself back into his good graces. Now he played on Trump?s deepest fear. If Trump picked a ?neocon?, a pro-Nato Republican like Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, the Times reported, ?then the US intelligence agencies would have every incentive to assassinate Mr Trump in order to get their preferred president?. Carlson was buttressed in waging his paranoid campaign to eliminate competitors to Vance by Donald Trump Jr, whom Carlson had recruited into the Vance inner circle.
Trump put Carlson on the platform at the Republican convention in order to have Tucker hail him as the ?kindest?, ?bravest? man of ?empathy? who ?actually cares?, and most ?wonderful person?. Carlson delivered his tribute seemingly unaware, or perhaps completely aware, that his speech was almost word for word a copy from the film The Manchurian Candidate of the brainwashed description of Raymond Shaw, the phoney Medal of Honor winner himself conditioned into becoming an assassin in a communist conspiracy to kill the party?s nominee for president and turn the country over to the Russians under a rightwing puppet. Maj Ben Marco, played by Frank Sinatra, who served with Shaw in Korea, breaks the code of the brainwashed idealization: ?Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I?ve ever known in my life.?
Vance is a construct. The man known as ?JD Vance? has existed for three years
Carlson and Vance have curiously parallel lives. One born to wealth, the other in poverty, both were partly abandoned children. Vance and Tucker are Lost Boys in their own Neverland who have signed up with Captain Hook.
Carlson?s mother, heiress to one of California?s oldest and greatest fortunes, left Tucker at the age of six for life in a hippy commune, never seeing him again. After his father remarried to the heiress of the Swanson frozen food fortune, Tucker was sent off to boarding school.
As Vance chronicled in his book, Hillbilly Elegy, his mother was suicidal and addicted to alcohol and heroin. ?Of all the things that I hated about my childhood, nothing compared to the revolving door of father figures,? he wrote. He was abandoned to be more or less raised by his grandmother, who from the age of 13 had four children and eight miscarriages, possibly some of them abortions. She once tried to set her drunken abusive husband, Vance?s grandfather, on fire while he slept.
Vance is a construct. The man known as ?JD Vance? has existed for three years. His various name changes tell only a superficial part of his story. James Donald Bowman carried his father?s middle and last name. When his parents divorced he dropped the middle name ?Donald? for ?David?. He took his stepfather?s last name when he became James David Hamel. In high school he called himself ?JD?. He graduated from Ohio State University and served in the military as James D Hamel. He was accepted to Yale Law School under that name. While at Yale, in 2010-2011, he blogged for David Frum?s FrumForum as JD Hamel.
He implied in his 2016 memoir that he took the name of JD Vance upon his wedding in 2014, but in fact he assumed the name ?Vance?, after his grandmother?s name, just before his graduation from Yale Law in 2013. Then, when he announced his candidacy for the Senate from Ohio in 2021, he removed the periods from his initials to become simply ?JD?. which is how he is listed in his US Senate biography.
Vance has had more mentors than name changes. One of them explained to me that his technique is to mirror them, one after another, to win approval and get ahead. His greatest skill is advancement through mimicry. A ruthless instinct for survival drives his hollow striving. He demonstrated his method in justifying Trump?s fabrication about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, eating cats and dogs. ?I say that we?re creating a story, meaning we?re creating the American media focusing on it,? he told Dana Bash on CNN. His own self-creation involves a lot of creativity.
From mentor to mentor, too numerous to mention without writing a small treatise, Vance has shape-shifted. Under the tutelage of the Yale Law professor Amy Chua, author of the terrifyingly strict parenting memoir Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, he framed his story. She threw out his first draft of a memoir, then directed and edited the writing and its promotion. Chua had been the making of Brett Kavanaugh?s career, helping to place him in a clerkship on the US court of appeals for the District of Columbia circuit, and she became a pipeline of clerks to him when he ascended to the US supreme court, advising her proteges that he preferred women who ?looked like models?. She advanced Usha Vance, whose match to JD she encouraged, to become a Kavanaugh clerk, while telling Vance not to apply for the post but to stick to composing the book.
Vance met Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley billionaire, at a Yale event. Thiel inducted him into his network, hiring him after graduation for his venture capital firm. In the 2016 campaign cycle, Thiel became the single largest donor to the Republican party. He was drawn to Trump?s darkness. Thiel is an anti-democratic, illiberal dystopian for whom Trump is a mere agent. When Vance ran for the Senate from Ohio in 2022, Thiel bankrolled him with $15m, a pittance for the potential investment.
Thiel and his venture capital network are heavily sunk into cryptocurrency. On the day before Trump anointed Vance as his VP, he endorsed a federal strategic bitcoin reserve that would put the US government behind the essentially worthless commodity. That would trigger an explosion of cryptocurrency products. Vance as vice-president would be a guarantor of an unregulated market that would almost certainly lead to financial chaos, the fleecing of small investors and new avenues for international crime.
skip past newsletter promotion Sign up to The Stakes ? US Election Edition Free newsletter The Guardian guides you through the chaos of a hugely consequential presidential election Enter your email address Sign up Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy . We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. after newsletter promotion
In 2019, Vance converted to Catholicism, embracing a particular strand of anti-liberal traditionalism. As a boy he had been a Pentecostal. At Yale, he was an avowed atheist. Through Thiel, he met a number of profoundly reactionary Catholic ideologues, including Patrick Deneen, author in 2023 of Regime Change, a manifesto for the ?Party of Order? to defeat the ?Party of Progress? to install ?the post-liberal order?. At a panel about the book at the Heritage Foundation, Vance appeared with Deneen and Kevin Roberts, the rightwing thinktank?s president and an adherent of Opus Dei, a reactionary Catholic sect developed in Franco?s Spain that is at war with Pope Francis?s liberal openings. Vance proclaimed himself there a cadre of the ?postliberal right? and ?explicitly anti-regime?, a further confession of faith.
At the time, Roberts was overseeing the publication of Project 2025, a far-right wish book of draconian policies for a second Trump term. Roberts wrote an accompanying book, Dawn?s Early Light: Burning Down Washington to Save America, for which Vance wrote the introduction. ?We are now all realizing that it?s time to circle the wagons and load the muskets,? he wrote. But when Trump tried to distance himself from the controversial Project 2025, the book?s publication was stopped, retitled ? ?Burning Down? scrapped for ?Taking Back? ? and pushed back until after the election.
Vance had also become close to another radical rightwing theocrat, Rod Dreher, a columnist for The American Conservative, a magazine founded by Patrick Buchanan, avatar of the America First movement. Dreher was present at Vance?s Catholic conversion ceremony. Yet Dreher had already left the Catholic church for Eastern Orthodoxy because, among other things, he felt Catholicism was controlled by a ?Lavender Mafia? of gay priests. In 2022, he went into voluntary exile in Hungary, where he became the director of Orb?n?s Danube Foundation ?network project?, for which he facilitated the trip of Carlson while he maintained his close relationship with Vance.
In his debate with Tim Walz, Vance was the trained attorney smoothly spreading an oil slick of falsehoods to defend his guilty client
When Vance wants to impress the theoreticians of the quasi- and neo-fascist right, he mirrors by echoing their special language, showing he is one of them. But when he wants to prove himself to Trump, he no longer poses as the intellectual manqu? but instead a standup insult comic.
His awkward jocularity and lame jokes, if they are jokes, almost always bomb. Notoriously, there?s the sophomoric snark of ?childless cat ladies?. There are his put-downs, such as: ?I?ve actually got thoughts in my head ? unlike Kamala Harris.? There was Vance?s misfired tweet intended to mock Harris by posting a 2007 video clip of Miss South Carolina Teen Caitlin Upton freezing in her answer to a question about finding the United States on a map ? only to have it revealed that Donald Trump subsequently offered her a job and that she had been a Trump supporter. She condemned Vance for ?online bullying?.
Vance wore a different persona than the apprentice name-caller in his debate with Tim Walz. Now he was the trained attorney smoothly spreading an oil slick of falsehoods to defend his guilty client. Vance lied that he never supported a national abortion ban; that Trump saved the Affordable Care Act ? Obamacare ? instead of trying to destroy it at every turn; and that ?illegal immigrants? in Springfield, Ohio, had ?overwhelmed? the community. When Margaret Brennan of CBS News corrected him that the Haitians there are legal immigrants, Vance revealed a glint of anger. ?Margaret, the rules were that you guys weren?t going to factcheck,? he complained. Facts are not his friend. Then, Vance closed with his most breathtaking lie, that Trump ?peacefully gave over power on January 20?, eliding January 6. With that, Vance could breathe easy that he had jumped the hurdle of the big lie.
JD obviously feels most comfortable bantering with Tucker. Together on stage, on 22 September, they jammed to stroke Trump?s narcissism as a true man of the people. Tucker kicked it off. ?It?s impossible,? he said, ?to imagine Carmela, or whatever she?s calling herself, Harris, talk to the lady behind the counter about the differences in quality and weight and price between the quarter pounder and the Big Mac. He has such strong feelings about it. He?s really thought about it a lot.?
JD chimed in. ?Well, and again, this goes to his leadership style,? he said. ?Donald Trump actually really cares of what people think. So, he has absolutely thought to himself, what is the better value between the quarter pounder and the Big Mac? He actually wants to know what the people who work there think about this question. And by the way, I have views about this. Obviously, the quarter pounder is a better deal.?
?That?s absurd,? replied Tucker. ?Without secret sauce, it?s not even worth going there. But whatever. Honest people disagree.?
?You?ve allowed yourself to be manipulated by the elites,? JD ribbed him. ?The secret sauce is not the thing that matters. It?s the amount of meat. You get way more meat with a quarter pounder.?
Vance clinched his point with an anecdote about being interviewed by Trump at Mar-a-Lago to be his running mate. Trump told him he had asked the gardener whom he should pick. ?I?m sitting there, sweating bullets like, ?Well, sir, what did the gardener at Mar-a-Lago have to say about who should be the VP??? Trump did not tell him. But, according to Vance, it proved ?he actually likes to know what people think about things. That?s one of his secrets of success as a political leader.? Vance did not interpret the incident as Trump toying with him in a humiliating little game in which he dangled the gardener as a determining factor in his fate.
Then Tucker and JD riffed about what JD called ?the Kamala switcheroo? in full Beavis and Butt-Head style. ?The switch-up, the disappearance of the president of the United States. Biden is still president, technically, correct?? says Tucker. ?I don?t know,? answers JD. ?I don?t either. I really don?t know. I don?t know what happened to him. He was pretty famous at one point, and then he?s just gone.? ?I saw some clip on social media that Jill Biden was running a cabinet meeting,? says JD. ?Was that real or was that ? for sure.? ?She?s a doctor, JD. Settle down. She?s got this. Anyone who hasn?t read her dissertation on community colleges in the state of Delaware really should see where the doctorate comes from. She literally is a part of it where she?s breaking down the proportion of bi-ethnicity of students ? I?m like, I?m not good at math.? ?Wait a second.? ?No,? says Tucker, ?you should read Dr Jill?s dissertation. It?s unbelievable. Anyway, she?s running the government, just so you know.? Hahaha.
In an earlier conversation for Tucker?s podcast, on 18 September, Tucker and JD blithely talked about the agenda of a coming Trump administration. ?If you guys win,? says Tucker, ?and you start firing people who are acting against orders of their commander-in-chief and against the expressed will of voters, the New York Times will call it a fascist takeover.? ?That?s exactly right,? replied JD. ?The question is, do you care?? ?Well,? JD answered, ?I think we have to not care.? He wasn?t joking.
